Vivinavi : World : () World

• ソースしょうゆ
• 2023/01/15 (Sun) 08:41
• Report

Any source the government puts out is a manipulated piece of information. If the cause of death is anything positive for corona, just say it's all corona, don't you remember what the WHO did ？.

• へい
• 2023/01/15 (Sun) 21:16
• Report

＞ If the cause of death is positive for corona of any kind, we can just call it all corona
and that's right. And it was the same last year, the year before, and still is （ Strictly speaking, they now exclude immediate deaths from accidents, as expected ）.
To put that in perspective, the number of deaths among the elderly is 16 times higher than in the same period last year.

#66, source ？. You don't need to search for it, it will be reported in the daily news.
But the difference between the affirmative and the negative is that the affirmative says it's because I didn't take that thing more than three times; the negative says it's because I took it more than three times.
And from the various data we have, it seems that the naysayers are right.

• エビデンス
• 2023/01/16 (Mon) 07:40
• Report

○ We request that all persons who are positive for novel coronavirus infection and who died while hospitalized or under medical care be published as "deaths", regardless of the exact cause of death.
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/000641629.pdf

• どうでもいい
• 2023/01/16 (Mon) 16:43
• Report

Positive ・ Negative

I'm bored

• へい
• 2023/01/16 (Mon) 18:04
• Report

No, it would be important.
If the mortality rate is higher for those who have had only two doses, then we should have a third dose, and if it is higher for those who have had more than three doses, then we should stop having them.
Then the question is, if the data is available, why is it not made public?