Vivinavi : World : () World

• やるやらやれ
• 2020/11/17 (Tue) 21:17
• Report
• Delete

China sent a congratulatory telegram.

• w
• 2020/11/17 (Tue) 21:18
• Report

I'm so full of myself, I wouldn't do it.

• なぜかというと
• 2020/11/17 (Tue) 21:32
• Report

The dictators of Russia, China, North Korea, and other countries that disrespect human rights have hit it off with Trump, who also disrespects human rights.
Dictators around the world don't like Democratic presidents who make more noise about human rights ・ than necessary.

• 新記録
• 2020/11/17 (Tue) 22:05
• Report

The NY Dow stock price has been surging around the time of the presidential election, but tomorrow it will be over $3,000 for the first time in history.

• 傍観だけでは終われなくなった3
• 2020/11/18 (Wed) 01:31
• Report

> This is quite puzzling.
I see ？ ?
I think you're trying too hard to come up with a fatal flaw in the system, and you're making an impossible interpretation ？

Many states use drivers licenses, voter registration cards, and past government documents for signature matching, but the purpose of signature matching in the first place is to prevent fraud. It is for the purpose of fraud prevention.

> If a voter without a registered signature votes by mail, it is a free pass.
Isn't that a stretch to think that ？ if you can't match a signature, you will be kicked out? If you are concerned about it, please check it out by yourself.

> "The person came later," but we don't know if it was him or not.
When double voting is discovered, it is a big problem, so you can't imagine the investigation.
> If the "person" didn't show up, then the fraud would go unnoticed and would go unnoticed
Yes, that's right. That's why I wrote that in-person voting is rather easier to cheat. But there is a reasonable chance of getting caught, and I don't think it would be possible in large numbers, considering who would want to risk that much.

> Who knows how much fraud there is in this system that hasn't been uncovered
If we're talking about possibility, you're right, but that's sort of a given ？
And the exact same thing could be said about the last election, and that level of possibility, it applies to almost everything in the world ？.

• 前に進みましょう
• 2020/11/18 (Wed) 07:55
• Report

In the end, everyone is trying too hard to get their own opinion across.

Trump, Biden,

and all the people fighting here

one can't live alone.

• 昭和のおとっつぁん
• 2020/11/18 (Wed) 08:19
• Report

#Trump's side has yet to produce any hard evidence.
When the trial starts, they will present evidence in court.
How can you show your hand when the trial hasn't started? Do you give your opponent time to come up with countermeasures?

• 凡人が
• 2020/11/18 (Wed) 08:24
• Report

1488
no matter how much you criticize Trump
you are not even a single gray hair of Trump

if you think about it calmly, if someone like that criticizes Trump, you have no sympathy at all

nobody who criticizes and smears is successful

It's a hobby for losers and people who are losing

• 傍観もね。。
• 2020/11/18 (Wed) 08:27
• Report

I thought he was a decent guy at first because he wrote the right things, but he ended up being a left-leaning smug bastard. He seems to have a low income.

Are you two bottom-feeders buddy-buddy and gay ？?

• あほすぎる
• 2020/11/18 (Wed) 08:34
• Report

> ↑ Only the management can tell you not to write here, as this is a place set up for each of us to express our opinions, assuming they do not violate the terms of the agreement.
If you don't like it, just don't read it. It's ugly to be jealous of bystanders and NASA who can logically state their opinions.


You are free to speak
You are also free not to post

Only the administrator can delete posts

If you don't like it, just don't read it ？

First of all ？

I wonder when you will become a success

Tohoho!

• そうか？
• 2020/11/18 (Wed) 10:02
• Report

>> I am surprised that so many people believe the mass media lies. Even the Japanese mass media is in a festival of biased reporting. Biden up, Trump down festival.

Watch FOX.
Every 10 minutes, they are spreading Trump side falsehoods to make people worried that this election is a fraud.

• ニュース
• 2020/11/18 (Wed) 10:27
• Report

The world is not so clean that we can trust only how credible it is or is not.

• ヒットラーの手法と同じ
• 2020/11/18 (Wed) 10:31
• Report

When you repeat falsehoods and lies on Twitter every day, it's easy to believe them, just like the believers.

• まずは信頼
• 2020/11/18 (Wed) 10:40
• Report

Once you win their trust, it's easy to fool them

The more skeptical people are, the more they believe once they believe

Marketing strategy is one of them

• ニュース
• 2020/11/18 (Wed) 11:00
• Report

1525
I don't think it's just the election results that are complicating things this time.

Republican supporters also have their own reasons for supporting the party. Tax aspects or government policy. Of course, many people believe in the bible. It's called a conspiracy theory. They strongly oppose it because they don't want their freedom taken away.

One more
is whether the election votes were rigged and another is the unification of the world and control of the people that the government is probably working behind the scenes.

In my personal opinion, I don't think it is a simple matter of opposing the claims of the deprived and the saved, but I think someone has to stop the disparity of society that is based on excessive freedom and at the expense of others.

However, I also have a thought. But I also think that the wealthy are opposed to higher taxes. They do not want to pay taxes for those who can work but do not work and live on compensation.

I don't know what is the best policy, but it is true that I feel that this is just a measure to increase the burden on those who work hard, let the lazy go free, and make them even lazier.

• なんだよこのソース
• 2020/11/18 (Wed) 11:11
• Report

1527
another bad comment about Trump ？ lol
in the end, others don't know what the truth is. ？

There are people who comfort, praise, scold, and judge you as if they know what they are talking about, but they always miss the point. It's not something that can be explained and understood, so I just let it slide. Fundamentally, you can't understand other people's true feelings and thoughts.

It's up to you to think you understand.

But there are so many people who want to give the right answer, and then they just assume our feelings and try to force us to be self-contained.

The more people don't express their own opinions, the worse their evaluation of others is.

• 傍観だけでは終われなくなった3
• 2020/11/18 (Wed) 13:47
• Report

> In all likelihood, mail-in ballots are easier to do. Considering the risk.
Simple idea of ignorance. LOL

The risk of double voting being discovered is the same either way. If discovered, there is certainly less risk of getting caught by mail, but

stealing/obtaining a ballot → voting in person at a polling place → no ID or signature verification, so the odds of being counted are higher.

steal/obtain ballot → vote by mail → get kicked off by signature verification, so unlikely to be counted.

If you want to successfully rig a mail-in ballot, it's almost impossible without separately stealing signatures, so it's not possible for a mail thief. A full-scale identity theft-type crime is required, but that also carries a high risk of being caught beforehand.

Or try to mail in a text message ？ That would be pointless because the success rate would be too low ？

In any case, as the original poster said, the system is not yet up to par. You're right, but that doesn't mean that it would be nearly impossible to pull off this kind of fraud in large numbers. So you would have to be a very stupid person to know that Trump's claims are delusional.

There is the problem of votes being cut off that should be counted, but that is more a disaster for the Republicans who just want to keep turnout down.

• 無秩序民主
• 2020/11/18 (Wed) 15:25
• Report

Postal Ballot ＞ If the postal worker throws it away, it's over. In fact, they're found in the trash. It's a fine injustice
Why is it still on the news now that the ballots are showing up? It's impossible
Why did they extend the postmark date by 3 days when it was already set. This is a violation of the Constitution
In-person voting would not do this. When you sign in, your name and date of birth are verified, so it's almost impossible to vote fraudulently
I hate anti-Republican party. They only say what suits them.

• へ〜
• 2020/11/18 (Wed) 18:20
• Report

> In any case, as I recall, the original poster said, you're right that the system is still catching up in many ways, but that doesn't make it nearly impossible to pull off this kind of fraud in large numbers. So you would have to be a very stupid person to know that Trump's claims are delusional.

I put the top lawyers in the whole country on it and they looked through it, and you are smarter than they are. Great ⭐︎ I bet your income is great too.

• とは言え
• 2020/11/18 (Wed) 20:11
• Report
• Delete

＞ In many states, it seems that driver's licenses, voter registration cards, and past government documents are used for signature verification, but signature verification is for fraud prevention purposes in the first place.

I looked up the California voter registration process and found that you sign an application form when you register as a voter.
In the case of mail-in ballots, this is how we verify signatures ？
In other words, there should be 100% signatures on the application form with respect to those who have registered, and we cannot accept an application form without a signature.

I naturally assumed that the ballot distribution list was created with this voter registration list, but now I know that is not the case.

＞ That's right, it's pretty much a monkey. But this is not the only case.

This means that ballots have been handed out in the past to people who have not submitted registration forms as voters

Even though we do strict signature verification, ballots are distributed to people who are not registered as voters, let alone registered to sign.
This is very puzzling to me.

because you could just distribute ballots to the voter registration list, but ballots are being distributed to people who are not on the list
so you either have to go to the trouble of creating a separate ballot distribution list from the voter list, or you have to add people who are not registered to the voter list to the list in the first place.
Either way, don't you wonder ？ why they would do that ？
if they don't think it's inexplicable ？

if they are going to jump people who are not on the voter list? ？

If there is no separate distribution list, then the voter list itself must have a list of people who have not applied to register, i.e., whose signatures are not on the voter list.


＞ Isn't it unreasonable to think that ？ if you can't match signatures, you will be kicked off the list? I think it is more natural to think that if you can't match signatures, you will be kicked.

It is unthinkable to add a person to the list in order to bounce him if he votes, so we should naturally assume that he will be accepted if he votes ？
The strictness of the signature verification and the fact that the ballot distribution list is not transparent is a huge contradiction. ？

The fact that your friend was bounced for having a different signature is an example of a person with a registered signature being bounced for having a different signature than the registered signature, not
how the votes of people whose signatures were not registered in the first place are treated. It seems less relevant to how the votes of people whose signatures are not registered in the first place are handled.


＞ Can't you imagine the investigation that would naturally take place if double voting is discovered?
But you said that there is no signature verification or ID requirement at the polling place ？
so there is no reason to find out

or is it that they don't check your identity but they check if you have already voted ？?
So if they find out that you have already voted, they will investigate you? ？


＞ If you are talking about possibilities, yes, but that is sort of obvious ？

It shouldn't be a matter of course
I think we should aim to eliminate the possibility of fraud as much as possible

At least, the fact that the ballot distribution list is not transparent increases the possibility of fraud.
Voting is the very foundation of democracy, and if it is not done properly, it cannot reflect the will of the people


I don't know if President Trump is just being unreasonable or if he has some certainty or assurance. I don't know if he's just being a spoiled brat or if he has some kind of certainty or assurance, but if there is a possibility that the flaws in the electoral system will be identified, I think that would be very welcome.